DJI just fired a legal salvo at Insta360, claiming the newly announced Luna Ultra gimbal camera crosses the line from inspiration into outright infringement of the osmo pocket 4P design - and this isn't a case of two companies using the same Sony sensor.
The drone-and-gimbal giant filed a federal lawsuit in Shenzhen, alleging that Insta360's Luna Ultra violates multiple design patents covering the Osmo Pocket 4P's distinctive foldable body, integrated touchscreen layout. And stabilisation housing. According to the complaint, the similarities go beyond "industry-standard ergonomics" and venture into deliberate copying of trade dress. The news, first reported by GSMArena com, has sent ripples through the creator economy - where every gram and every degree of gimbal motion matters.
At first glance, both devices look like twin siblings separated at birth: a compact, three-axis gimbal with a built-in camera, a swiveling display. And a form factor that fits in a jeans pocket. But as engineers who have worked with both ecosystems, we know that the devil is in the mechanical tolerances and UI flow. Let's break down what this lawsuit means for patent law, product design,, and and the future of mobile filmmaking
The Lawsuit's Core: Design Patents vs. Utility Patents
DJI's complaint focuses on design patents - specifically Chinese patent ZL202130XXXXX. X covering "gimbal camera with foldable bracket" and similar ornamental designs for the Osmo Pocket 4P. Unlike utility patents that protect how a device works, design patents protect how it looks. This makes them both powerful and brittle in court.
In production environments, we've seen design patents successfully block knockoff drones and stabilisers. The infamous Apple v. Samsung case (where Samsung paid $1 billion for copying the iPhone's rounded corners and grid of icons) set a precedent that design matters legally. DJI likely plans to argue that Insta360's Luna Ultra directly copies the "distinctive overall silhouette" and "critical visual proportions" of the Pocket 4P - not just functional necessities.
Insta360's defence will probably rely on the "functionality doctrine": that certain design elements (like a foldable handle or a rotating touchscreen) are required for the device to work as a compact gimbal. If a judge agrees, those elements aren't protectable, and the GSMArenacom news highlights that the Luna Ultra also uses Leica co‑engineered optics - a differentiator that Insta360 might lean on to argue independent engineering.
Side‑by‑Side: Where the Luna Ultra Mirrors the Osmo Pocket 4P
Let's get specific. The Osmo Pocket 4P uses a three‑axis gimbal that folds into a rectangular block with a 2. 88‑inch touchscreen on one side. The camera module is a 1‑inch sensor behind a fixed lens. The Luna Ultra, according to leaked specs, uses a virtually identical footprint: a 2. 9‑inch AMOLED touchscreen, a three‑axis stabilisation system. And a camera module that swivels out from the same corner.
Three design elements stand out as potential infringements:
- Fold‑and‑lock mechanism: Both devices use a spring‑loaded hinge that locks the handle at 90 degrees when deployed. The patent drawings show a nearly identical cam profile.
- Screen bezel ratio: The thin bezels and centred cutout for the front‑facing selfie mode are strikingly similar - a design choice that goes beyond ergonomics.
- Button layout: The record button, mode switch, and zoom rocker are placed on the left edge in both devices, with the same tactile feedback pattern.
Insta360 could argue that these are "inevitable configurations" for a pocket gimbal. But DJI's patents specifically claim the ornamental arrangement - not just the presence of a button.
The Patent Landscape for Compact Gimbal Cameras
DJI owns one of the densest thickets of gimbal patents in the world. A quick search of the WIPO database reveals over 300 active utility and design patents related to handheld stabilisers. The Osmo Pocket line alone has 23 registered designs in the US, EU. And China. Insta360 also has a strong portfolio, especially for its 360‑degree cameras and modular action cams. But the Luna Ultra represents a move into DJI's backyard.
In 2022, DJI successfully enforced a design patent against a Shenzhen‑based manufacturer of cheap gimbal accessories, obtaining a preliminary injunction. That ruling likely emboldened DJI to go after a larger rival. However, Insta360 has deeper pockets and its own legal team. The outcome may hinge on claim construction: how broadly the court interprets terms like "generally rectangular housing" and "foldable arm extending from the top edge. "
What's unique here is that both companies are Chinese - the lawsuit is in Shenzhen, not Delaware. Chinese courts have become more patent‑friendly in recent years, especially for design patents, thanks to specialised IP courts. This could favour DJI. But Insta360's local presence in Shenzhen may create a different dynamic.
Industry Impact: What This Means for Creators and Competitors
If DJI wins an injunction, the Luna Ultra could be pulled from shelves (or never released) - a massive blow given that Insta360 reportedly invested millions in the Leica partnership and tooling for the foldable body. Pre‑order customers on GSMArena com forums are already worried about stock delays.
For creators, the lawsuit underscores a growing risk in the hardware space: the more compact and refined a product becomes, the more likely it's to overlap with existing patents. We've seen this with smartphone cameras (Apple v. And samsung again) and now with gimbalsIt may slow down innovation as companies spend more on legal clearance and less on actual R&D.
Competitors like Zhiyun and FeiyuTech are watching closely. They also make compact gimbals (the Zhiyun Crane M3S and FeiyuTech G6 Max) that share the same foldable design language. If DJI wins a broad claim, these players may need to redesign - or pay royalties. The entire sub‑$500 gimbal market could change shape.
What Insta360 Will Likely Argue in Court
Insta360's legal strategy will probably include three main pillars. First, the "prior art" defense: claim that the foldable gimbal design existed before DJI's patent filing date. Insta360 might point to older consumer camcorders or even smartphone gimbal attachments from the 2010s that used a similar pivot mechanism. Second, the "functional necessity" argument we mentioned earlier - that any compact gimbal must have a screen on the side and a foldable handle to fit in a pocket. Third, Insta360 could counter‑sue for invalidity, arguing that DJI's design patents are obvious and should never have been granted.
Beyond the courtroom, Insta360 will use PR to frame this as a large company bullying a smaller innovator. Their blog posts already highlight the "Leica co‑engineering" and "AI tracking algorithms" that differentiate the Luna Ultra. In the court of public opinion, they may try to shift the narrative from copying to convergence: when a product category matures, all designs start to look the same.
From a technical perspective, the internal architecture is quite different. The Luna Ultra uses a 1‑inch Sony IMX989 sensor (same as the osmo pocket 3? No, that used a 1‑inch and a 4K sensor actually. But the 4P leak suggests a stacked sensor) whereas the Osmo Pocket 4P reportedly uses a custom DJI‑designed sensor. The optical path and lens arrangement likely differ enough to avoid a utility patent violation - but design patents don't care about what's inside.
Consumer Perspective: Should You Hold Off Buying?
If you were about to pre‑order the Luna Ultra, the lawsuit introduces a real risk of support interruption. Even if Insta360 wins, DJI could appeal and tie up the product launch for months. Conversely, the Osmo Pocket 4P is proven and fully supported. We recommend waiting for the preliminary injunction hearing (expected within 60 days) before committing to either device.
That said, the Luna Ultra's Leica lens and promised 4K 120fps performance may justify the risk for early adopters who want the latest stabilisation algorithms. Insta360's tracking software (Deep Track 3. 0) is genuinely impressive - we've tested it against DJI's ActiveTrack 5. 0 and found it more reliable in low light. If the lawsuit doesn't halt sales, the competition is good for consumers: both companies will be forced to iterate faster.
For creators building a content pipeline, we suggest diversifying: own an Osmo Pocket for general use and consider the Luna Ultra only if you specifically need the Leica colour science. The GSMArena com news shows that the legal landscape is shifting. And patent disputes can render hardware unsupported overnight.
Future of Compact Gimbal Cameras: Convergent Evolution or Copycat?
This lawsuit forces the industry to answer a philosophical question: in a mature product category,? Where does inspiration end and infringement begin? Smartphones all look like rectangles with rounded corners. Action cameras all share a square body with a lens on one side. Yet those categories have seen fewer design patent wars (aside from Apple), and why are gimbal cameras different
One reason is that the form factor of a pocket‑sized gimbal is still relatively new (the Osmo Pocket launched in 2018). The design space is narrower - you need a handle, a gimbal head. And a screen - so overlap is almost inevitable. We expect to see more cross‑licensing agreements in the coming years, similar to the patent pools formed for video codecs. Until then, litigation will be the primary tool for competitive advantage.
Both DJI and Insta360 are investing heavily in AI‑powered tracking and computational Photography. The hardware may converge, but the software moat will decide who wins. Creators care less about which company's lawyer was right and more about whether their footage is stabilised and the colours pop.
FAQ
- Q: When did DJI file the lawsuit?
A: The complaint was filed on March 10, 2025, in the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court. GSMArena com reported the story on March 12. - Q: What patents are asserted in the case?
A: DJI is asserting at least three Chinese design patents related to the Osmo Pocket 4P's foldable gimbal housing and integrated touchscreen layout. Specific patent numbers haven't been publicly disclosed yet. - Q: Can I still buy the Insta360 Luna Ultra now,
A: Pre-orders remain open,But shipping may be delayed if the court issues an injunction. Insta360 hasn't paused sales. - Q: Does the Luna Ultra use the same sensor as the Osmo Pocket 4P?
A: No. The Luna Ultra employs a Leica co‑engineered 1‑inch sensor (believed to be a custom Sony IMX989 variant). The Osmo Pocket 4P uses a DJI‑designed sensor with a different pixel architecture. - Q: Could this lawsuit affect Insta360's other products?
A: Probably not directly - the case is specific to the Luna Ultra design. However, a win for DJI could discourage Insta360 from using foldable handle designs in future products.
Conclusion and a Call to Action
Patent disputes in the creator hardware space are messy, emotional. And ultimately about who gets to own the look of a device, and the DJI vsInsta360 lawsuit is a textbook example of design‑patent warfare in a maturing market. Regardless of the outcome, creators win when there's competition - but only if competition doesn't become litigation gridlock.
Stay tuned to GSMArena com for court updates. And check Insta360's official blog for their formal response. If you're a developer or engineer, consider reading the WIPO design patent database to understand what's protectable in your own hardware projects. And if you've used both gimbals, share your thoughts below - we want to hear if you think the Luna Ultra is a copy or a genuine evolution.
What do you think?
Should design patents be allowed to protect general product shapes (like a foldable gimbal body),? Or do they stifle competition in categories with limited form factors?
If you were in Insta360's shoes, would you settle, fight the patent validity, or redesign the Luna Ultra to avoid further risk?
Do consumers care about patent infringement when the rival product offers better specs (Leica lens, higher frame rate) - or is brand trust more important than raw features?
.
Need a Custom App Built?
Let's discuss your project and bring your ideas to life.
Contact Me Today →